Can Jurors See and Hear Your Most Important Evidence?

I subscribe to several newsletters and feeds in an attempt to keep myself on the "cutting edge" of presentation technology. As such, from time to time I receive a familiar sounding tome that reinforces my thought process as well as my attempt to bring law firms into the 21st Century with affordable presentation solutions.

Such was the case when I received an emailed newsletter from Elliot Wilcox, a practicing attorney who has carved out his own niche in the "Trial Presentation Arena" with a website and support service entitled "Trial Presentation Theatre".

I've purchased most of Elliot's material (Nope-no discount! and this blog entry was MY idea) and have enjoyed his approach immensely and would strongly suggest that, if nothing else, any lawyer faced with today's challenges of prepping for a court presentation should subscribe to Elliot's newsletter. Of course Elliot would prefer you buy his top-notch information package - but - I think he can make the sale on his own - it's that good. (Check out this "about" link for more info).

Anyway -After I received his newsletter I asked Elliot if I could reproduce it here since I felt his  message hit the mark and... since I've been too busy to formulate my own musings it bails me out as well!

So - Read, Learn and Enjoy!

..................................................................................................................................................................................

It's not enough to get your exhibits admitted into evidence.  You need to make sure that the jury can see and/or hear it, too.  This week's article will help you present your evidence to the jury.  I hope it helps you during your next trial!

Best wishes for success in your next trial,
Elliott - signature
Elliott Wilcox
Editor - Trial Tips Newsletter

ABOUT ELLIOTT: Elliott Wilcox has served as the lead trial lawyer in nearly 200 jury trials and more non-jury trials than he can count.  He trains hundreds of trial lawyers every year how to improve their courtroom presentation skills, and his trial advocacy articles are read by thousands of trial lawyers in every continent around the world except one.  (If you know any lawyers in Antarctica, please send them to www.TrialTheater.com !)

Feature Article

“Can Jurors See and Hear Your Most Important Evidence?”
by Elliott Wilcox

If you try enough cases, you'll eventually get your hands on “It.”   “It” is that amazing piece of evidence that makes or breaks your case.  “It” takes on many different forms:

  • The “Are you lying then or are you lying now?” prior inconsistent statement
  • The “I did it, and I'd do it again!” confession
  • The video of the “disabled” plaintiff easily lifting 50 lb. bags of mulch or participating in semi-professional wrestling matches
  • The “smoking gun” email that proves the defendant knew about the potential danger and decided to cover it up rather than recall the product

It” is that piece of evidence that you can't wait to show to the jury.  You won't have “It” in every case, but when you do, it's a wonderful feeling.  You know that as soon as you show “It” to the jury, the case will be won.

But hold on just a second.  There's something important you should know before you show “It” to the jury. 

No matter how damning that prior inconsistent statement may be, it's worthless if the jury can't hear it.  Even if your video completely contradicts the plaintiff's claims, it's worthless if the jury can't see it.  Some jurors are too embarrassed to admit they can't hear the recording, can't read your exhibit, or can't see your video.  You need to be assured that they see and hear “It.”  Here's how to do it:

My, what big ears you have!1. How to guarantee that the jury hears every word of your recorded statement.  As you start playing the audio recording, cup your hand over your ear and make eye contact with each and every juror.  Non-verbally, you're asking them if they can hear the statement.  If they can hear it, they'll nod their heads in agreement or give you a “thumbs-up” sign.  If they can't hear, they'll give you a non-verbal clue to raise the volume (or maybe even tell you, “Turn it up, I can't hear!”) 

Here's an added benefit: Making eye contact with each juror forces you to “check in” with them, so you can evaluate how things are going.

2. How to guarantee that the jury sees your video.  Get to the courtroom early and set up your video display.  Turn on your video, then climb into the jury box.  Sit in every seat in the jury box so you can see what your jurors will see.  Do you need to crane your neck to see the video?  When you move to the end of each row, does it become difficult to see the video screen?  Is the screen too close?  Too far?  Make any adjustments now, before the jury gets here, so you can be assured that they'll see your evidence.

Once you start playing the video for the jury, you'll want to repeat the step outlined above to ensure that they can hear the recording.  While you're making eye contact with each juror, track their sightline.  Can they actually see the video?  Are they actually looking at it?  If not, make any necessary adjustments so they can view your evidence.

3. How to guarantee that the jury reads your exhibit.  If you're presenting written exhibits to the jury (such as posters of the jury instructions or blow-ups of contract highlights) you want to make sure the jury actually reads your exhibit.  To make sure they have enough time to read it, quietly read through the entire exhibit to yourself twice.  You're already familiar with the exhibit, so you're going to read through it faster than your jurors will.  After your second read-through, take a moment to make eye contact with every juror.  Look at their eye movement.  If they're looking at you, they're ready for you to proceed.  But if you see they're still reading, don't say anything yet.  Wait until everyone has finished reading before you or your witness say anything about the exhibit.

If you've done your homework, you already know how to make “It” admissible.  You also know when you should publish “It” for maximum persuasive effect.  Now just follow these simple tips, and you'll guarantee that jurors will see and hear your most important evidence.

Elliott Wilcox publishes Trial Tips Newsletter.  Sign up today for your free subscription and a copy of his special report: “The Ten Critical Mistakes Trial Lawyers Make (and how to avoid them),” at www.TrialTheater.com

Collaboration Tools and Technologies-Smart Ways To Work Together

The title say it all !

Well, actually the full title is "The Lawyer's Guide To Collaboration Tools and Technologies, Smart Ways To Work Together" by Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell, but, you get the picture, right?

Generally I try not ot wander too much away from trial presentation tips but, in this case I've got to comment about a much ballyhooed book that covers almost every aspect of communicating within a lawfirm not only with your peers but with your (all important) vendors as well.

This book is an excellent A to Z treatment of something we all take for granted: Communication with one another

The authors take a no-nonsense approach to the obvious (and not so obvious) and guide the reader through the mechanics of effectively coordinating not only the workflow in a firm but efficient methods of coordinating that workflow.

From effectively and (more importantly) efficiently using email,to exploring the use of "Wicki's", Blogs and RSS Feeds this is the ideal guidebook for those serious about productivity and workflow communication within the firm and with the firms' (outsourced) vendors.

I feel that the firm that takes the time to invest in this guide and actually take the methods to heart (and actually implement them) will have the advantage of a coherent presentation based on solid information management and execution. Which, in turn, makes the work of your vendors that much easier.

While the "Guide" is loaded with prime examples of effective communication techniques you'll probably only need to adopt a few (depending upon what you currently have in place) to see an overall improvement in your product.

 Do yourself a BIG favor and buy the book; it's one of the better investments you'll make for your firm.

 

 

Your Courtroom Presentation - Sending The "Clearest Message"

More times then we'd like to admit we receive a video or audio tape at the Video Resources forensics department that is practically unviewable or unintelligible and we're asked to "clean it up", you know, like they do on the "CSI" television shows.

Unfortunately, since most, if not all of what is seen on "CSI", "Las Vegas" and "Crossing Jordan" is techno-BS we have to inform the customer that we can only do so much - basic laws of physics govern our services rather than imagined, non-existent, special effects.

That's not to say that we can't improve on the evidence, but, alas, we cannot work miracles.

For those cases that we can help with we generally advise on the best method to present the media - possibly a self-amplifed audio system to fill the room with clear sound, for instance.

So it was refreshing to read a post by Judge Christina Habbas of Colorado entitled "Don't Be Tempted To Use Technology Unless It Makes Your Presentation Clear" wherein Judge Habbas advises:

"Beware of playing tape recordings for a jury. Criminal cases often include audio- or video-taped interviews. Many times, these recordings are not clear – either because of the quality of sound, the presence of static or interference, or even the size of the courtroom making listening difficult. I am watching a capable prosecutor try to punctuate his Closing Argument in a Sexual Assault on a Child case by playing portions of the Defendant’s audio-taped statement, using his own words against him. My courtroom is a large cave – sound is often muffled and unintelligible. The prosecutor is frustrated in his playing of the tape, although he has taken great care to transfer the portions of the statement to his computer. Unfortunately, the speakers, the corruption of the sound recording, and the size of the courtroom have made it impossible for the jury to hear clearly, thus having little impact. Perhaps the prosecutor should have simply read a transcript of the Defendant’s words to the jury to illustrate his point.

Contrast this with the very end of a Closing Argument in another Assault case a few weeks ago: there, one of the victims was video-taped during her review of a photo array of potential suspects. As she looked at each photograph, she took her time, and placed each photo on the desk when she did not recognize the person. That is, until she saw the Defendant’s photograph. Her reaction was immediate and extreme. The prosecutor ended her Closing Argument by replaying only those last seconds of the video – without comment. The strength of that presentation left a major impact on the jury.

Moral: Don’t be tempted to use technology – ANY technology -- unless it makes your presentation clear."

At the Video Resources Litigation Assistance Division we've witnessed the same response countless times with sychchronized text with video testimony - you can't capture the body language, the voice inflections or the facial expressions by "reading to your audience".

There's no substitute for actually letting them hear or see the testimony firsthand.

But please, do it right!

Courtroom Technology - Coming of Age in the 21st Century

In the past few years you couldn't have helped but notice that things are changing in the courtroom. In 1996   the public got a glimpse of a (then) state-of -the-art courtroom presentation of the nationally televised trial of  OJ Simpson.  As I recall the only visuals provided were crime scene photos, a few timeoline graphs and several DNA-related drawings. Laptops were at the disposal of the attorneys and Barry Scheck made the most of an overhead projector.

More and more often in todays court an average jury will be made up of a majority of people who are visual learners. That is, they will want, at a deep psychological level, to have information presented to them visually. The majority of the public are quite comfortable getting their information via a "talking head" or through a demonstrative exhibit. 

Most jury psychologists, including Amy Singer, believe that people learn much more through seeing and hearing rather than from hearing alone.  The use of demonstrative evidence usually grabs the jury's attention and often has them sitting at the edge of their seats when things like models and objects are being shown.

Unfortunately, most litigators are auditory learners who prefer to teach orally.

Although this is quite natural for them it isn't always the most effective form of communicating an argument or building a foundation.

The problem created when these two groups communicate with one another is easily appreciated: Litigators feel effective by "saying it" and most jurors would rather "see it."

Today's courtroom has the potential for so much gadgetry and wizardry the American Bar Association has created a webpage to address the available technology entitled "(the) Legal Technology Resource Center"The Federal Judicial Center has also weighed in with the publication of "Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judges Guide to Pretrial and Trial".

My mission is  to assist you, the litigator by assisting you to make an informed decision as to what may or may not be applicable to a case you're presenting when you're considering adding  "Ooh and Ahh" visuals to bolster your argument.

Sometimes you need to take a deep breath and rethink your options and look at the bigger picture - and we're here to help.

Services

As the name implies, Video Resources, Inc is a powerhouse of creative talent capable of producing everything from corporate educational  videos, television advertising, radio spots and product rollouts.

The Litigation Support Division at Video Resources, Inc offers a variety of professional  litigation support services

including:

  • Video Depositions / Synchronizing video and audio recordings with written transcripts
  • "Day in the Life" Videos
  • "Visionary Litigation Software" support
  • Creation of digital video and audio clips for computerized presentations

  • Video Resources, Inc. is a complete, in-house video production facility. Our talented editors can hone your videos to maintain focus on the important aspects of your case.

  • Video Formats Available – DVCAM, MiniDV, HDV, Betacam-SP, DVD-Video, Video CD, VHS, SVHS, MPEG, WMV, Quicktime, Digital Hi8.

  • Playback of Betamax, 8mm, Hi-8, Digital 8, DVCPRO, DVHS, Digital Betacam, ¾” Umatic, LaserDisc. Other formats can be procured quickly from our network of equipment suppliers.

  • Photographs Taken from Video - Creation of still prints from video

  • Duplication and Editing - Duplication of video depositions and other video recordings. Editing depositions for use at trial, arbitration, mediation, and settlement conferences

  • Transfer of video footage to VHS, CD-ROM, DVD-Data and DVD Video

  • .Audio Dubbing - Standard, Microcassette, Minicassette

  • Video and Audio Clarification (Enhancement)